(StephenJSmith.com--Murfreesboro, TN) Critiques of President Barack Obama and his commitment to address addressing the economic, educational, and societal disparities president in the Black community are not recent news.  However, throughout the past 18 months, voices from prominent Black leaders and intellectuals have spoken out in both support and opposition of the Obama administration’s lack of an agenda for the impoverished and disenfranchised members of Blacks in America.

From television and radio personality Tavis Smiley’s call for a “Black Agenda” in 2010 to Dr. Cornel West’s statements last week accusing Obama of essentially being a “white man in black skin,” the criticisms of both Obama’s policies and blackness have been thrown in the ring of public discussion.  From what began as a unwavering loyalty and dedication to the support of President Obama and all for which he stands has now become what seems to be a house divided when discussing Black sentiments toward the Obama administration and the presidential agenda that isn’t as progressive as they believed it would be.

As with most widely debated issues in the Black community, a grasp of the proper context in which to frame this debate can go a long way. 

What factors over time created the varying perspectives within the Black community related to President Obama and his efforts to aid Black people? Are the critiques of Obama made by today’s “Black leadership” coming from the right places, or are the detracting statements simply the result of bruised egos?

These are the kinds of questions we all must ascertain if we are to aid in the progression of the debate, as opposed to contributing to its dilution.

The truth of the matter is this:  Barack Obama is the President of the United States, not the President of Black America.  Is there more that can be done to address the educational woes that plague Black communities across the country? Probably so, but the increase in funding for federal student loans (which had a disproportionately positive impact on African-American students) and an executive order to increase HBCU funding by $98 million prove that the educational deficiencies within the Black community are not being ignored.

Could he make the effort to meet more frequently with members of the Congressional Black Caucus? I believe so.  However, I hardly believe Obama’s lack of frequent meetings with CBC membership translates as him not being connected to the needs of the Black community.  While he may not meet with the CBC legislators as much as they may desire, Obama has plenty of people working to maintain the pulse of what goes on in all minority communities: Asian-American, Hispanic, Indian American, Native American, Muslim, Jewish, Mormon, and, yes, the Black community.

Remember, before we as people raise our voices to say President Obama is not addressing what we call “Black issues,” ask yourself what are YOU doing to address these “Black issues” you come across more frequently than he does.  Are you attending your local city council meetings, asking the questions to which your community needs answers?  How often do you practice and promote sound fiscal responsibility in your daily life?

We must remember that for change to occur with any issue in the Black community, beginning with looking in the mirror is paramount to accomplishing our goals.  We have to wake up from the “Black President euphoria” and realize that the first person of color elected as the Leader of the Free World does not absolve us of our responsibilities as a people, nor does it provide us a scapegoat for all that ails our communities.  The sooner we realize this, the sooner we can see positive results from which we all can reap the benefits.

Consider this: After President Obama’s second term in office ends in 2016 (which isn’t very far way), what will we do then? Go back to blaming the “White Man?” -_-
Picture
Democratic presidential hopeful, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., right, is applauded by Princeton Professor Cornel West, far left, as he takes the stage at the Martin Luther King Day March to the Dome in Columbia, S.C., Monday, Jan. 21, 2008. (AP Photo/Elise Amendola) AP
Stephen Smith is a recent graduate fromt the University of Tennessee-Knoxville with degrees in Political Science and Africana Studies.  He is currently working in Tennessee as a Field Organizer for Organizing for America.  In 2009, he created StephenJSmith.com, a fully-interactive site featuring the latest world news, blogs, interviews, social commentary, and preferred readings.  He can be contacted at stephen.smith1911@gmail.com.
1 Comment
 
 
Picture
In recent weeks, we've heard quite a few rumblings about the Tea Party Movement and its racial undertones.  The recent happenings have the whole country talking.  However, where has all the talk led us? Do many of us even know what the Tea Party is about? Do we realize the potential damage the Tea Party Movement can do to American politics as we know it today? Let's take a closer look...


The Tea Party movement is an American socio-political movement that arose in 2009 as a result of several nationally and locally coordinated protests.  Its roots stem from Ron Paul's presidential campaign in which supporters rallied behind Paul's fiscal conservatism, a value which the Tea Party strongly advocates.


Tea Party protests are usually in opposition to federal laws, mainly economically-focused.  The main laws protested through the Tea Party movement are the Healthcare Reform Bills, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (commonly known as the "Stimulus Bill") , the Federal Reserve Transparency Act, and the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (also known as the financial bailout). Tea Party supporters emphatically express their dissatisfaction with government spending, taxes, and government involvement in the private sector.


Local Tea Party protests have drawn a great amount of negative press over the last few weeks.  Statements of hate and bigotry made at these rallies have overtaken news outlets and have sparked intense debate about whether the movement's real problem is with the president's policies or the president's pigment. However, bigoted statements and other unfounded accusations about our current government are to be expected considering the movement's purpose: speak out against and derail any of the POTUS and Democratic Party's plans.
The dangerous aspect of the Tea Party movement is that most of the supporters cannot even articulate their grievances with the government in power.  You'll always hear "OBAMA IS A SOCIALIST," "STOP THE SPENDING," and "CUT TAXES," but when asked about specific socialist practices of which the Obama administration has been guilty or about the specific things on which the government should stop spending, most have absolutely no clue. Some Tea Party supporters speak in pure, unadulterated hate
aimed at the Obama administration, the Democratic Party, and anyone else that does not align with their views.
This type of "blind protesting" can be dangerous on both political and social levels.  Put it this way: with a lack of knowledge on the issues, it is easier to stray from the original focus of the debate and wander into personal bias and prejudice (racial, political, etc.), which can lead to a skewing and slanting of the facts.  This, in turn, can mislead many voters and have an incredibly negative effect on several aspects of government, with campaign strategies and nationwide distrust of politics feeling the most immediate of consequences.


In conclusion, do not be led to believe this is only about the Tea Party movement.  If we're all honest with ourselves, a large majority of people against the Tea Party movement and other conservatives are just as uneducated/uninterested in the real issues of our government.  Each and every one of us living in this country should feel as if they are personally responsible for educating not only ourselves on the issues, but also each other.  


The government will never truly work for the people until the people begin to engage in RESPECFUL and EDUCATED dialogue. Only then will be able to demand what is REALLY needed for the country as a whole to move forward.
1 Comment